Competing priorities for public education
Date Posted: 10/21/2016 | Author: Monty Exter
Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick held a press conference yesterday to lay out his priorities for the 85th Legislative Session. To no one's surprise, those priorities were heavily centered on the privatization of public education and the defunding of neighborhood schools through passage of the latest voucher fad. Certainly, there are many priorities the state can and should address to improve the way we meet our constitutional obligation to make available a system of free public schools to the state's roughly 6 million school-aged children, but vouchers are not one of them. In addition to costing the state potentially billions of dollars, the consensus of the research finds that voucher programs don’t, in any uniform or significant way, increase educational outcomes for the students who use them. Additionally, despite voucher proponents' claims to the contrary, the research does not find any competition-driven boost to the public system. The competitive effect that can be observed is a diversion of money from the classroom into marketing budgets. Instead of continuing to focus on this perennial distraction on behalf of those few but influential interests who stand to gain from the privatization of our public schools, the lieutenant governor and the legislature should work on behalf of all students and parents to address the state's real educational priories. To highlight a few, they could:
- address the preparation, retention, and equitable distribution of classroom educators, the single most influential factor on a child’s educational attainment;
- address the stress-inducing drill-and-kill environment in many of our struggling schools created by the state accountability system, which makes it virtually impossible for these children to learn according to neuroscience;
- address the state’s continuing struggle to attain universal, full-day, and high-quality prekindergarten; and
- address our flawed system of school finance; address its inadequate weights for low-socioeconomic groups, English language learners, and special education populations; address the layer upon layer of inefficient and inequitable "hold harmless" provisions.
CONVERSATION
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
03/27/2026
Teach the Vote’s Week in Review: March 27, 2026
The House and Senate gear up to make moves in the interim. Plus: Gear up for “Maycember” with ATPE Summit Keynote Speaker Juan Bendana.
03/27/2026
House interim charges announced
Speaker Dustin Burrows has issued public education-related charges across multiple committee. Interim charges are often a peek at the next session’s agenda.
03/25/2026
Abbott’s big government property tax push escalates with direct implications for public schools and local control
For educators, this debate is about far more than property tax bills. It is about whether the state is prepared to fully and sustainably fund public education if local revenue is reduced.