House Public Ed examines increase in number of uncertified teachers
![Teach the Vote](https://teachthevote.org:443/Content/images/TTV_Logo.png)
Date Posted: 8/14/2024 | Author: Tricia Cave
The Texas House Public Education Committee held its second day of interim hearings Tuesday, focusing on the rising number of uncertified teachers in Texas, as well as opportunities to improve early literacy and numeracy in PK-3.
The committee questioned invited panelists on the underlying cause of the increase in uncertified educators, which districts are hiring them and why, and what the state can do to address the issue. Currently, more than one-third of all new educator hires in Texas are uncertified, according to Texas Education Agency Deputy Commissioner Kelvey Oeser.
Reliance on uncertified teachers can be problematic for several reasons, including increased turnover. The average five-year retention rate for uncertified educators is currently 39%—which is significantly less than the retention rate of their certified peers, particularly among those who have completed traditional four-year educator preparation programs. This revolving door of new uncertified teachers then exacerbates the teacher burnout crisis. Additional burdens are placed on more seasoned members of the team who are expected to pick up the slack. Another complication is the inability to track career and disciplinary data for uncertified educators as they move from district to district. An uncertified educator disciplined in one district can simply move districts, and the new district has no way to research that educator’s background as it could do with a certified educator. The prior district would have had no way to file any sanctions with the state because the educator has no certificate to sanction. All these issues add up to potential problems for students.
The rise in the number of districts becoming Districts of Innovation (DOI) was repeatedly cited as one reason for the explosion of uncertified teachers in Texas. The DOI status was created by HB 1842 during the 84th legislative session in 2015. The purpose of DOI was to provide more flexibility to districts so they could be creative and innovative in their methods and practices. In reality, however, DOI has mostly allowed districts flexibility from regulations such as school start dates, class size, and teacher certification. Districts are unfettered in their ability to hire uncertified teachers under the DOI system. This has led to an explosion of uncertified teachers in Texas classrooms as the Great Resignation occurred and many veteran teachers left the classroom.
![](/getmedia/1c6860bc-6052-47b9-bb21-230176e6f17b/240814_JSerna-Interim-Hearing.png?width=280&height=210)
ATPE Immediate Past State President Jayne Serna testified that teacher attrition, especially during the school year, is very disruptive to students, and that not having a highly qualified educator makes learning virtually impossible. “The most important factor in a successful classroom is the teacher, and the most successful teacher is certified,” Serna stated. Serna recommended the committee amend DOI rules to limit uncertified teachers to career and technical education (CTE) courses where a person with field experience could be brought in to teach subjects such as welding; amending DOI rules to prohibit exemptions from parental notification if their child is in an uncertified teacher’s classroom; and a grant program to assist uncertified educators with obtaining certification.
When recommending possible solutions to the uncertified teacher problem, Oeser said: “It will be important to address a continuum of policy solutions within recruitment [and] consider expanding ‘grow your own’ programs to encourage more high school students and paraprofessionals to become teachers and to get teaching certificates. Within preparation, consider restructuring the certification framework to differentiate between higher-quality programs and lower-quality options and providing additional funding incentives to offset the higher costs of the higher-quality programs. Within novice teacher supports, consider expanding the mentor program allotment, and within compensation, consider increasing and differentiating the minimum salary schedule by certification pathway and expanding the Teacher Incentive Allotment.”
Additionally, Oeser recommended making the profession more attractive by raising teacher pay. Rep. Alma Allen (D–Houston), a former classroom teacher and administrator, agreed with this, pointing out that people stay where they are happy, appreciated, and well compensated. She accused the state of “destroying the profession” by not addressing teacher pay and other workplace concerns over the past several years.
“Pay is important,” Allen said. “It’s been important for many years. Nobody’s attracted to the profession anymore. Nobody’s going into the profession, and they’re leaving in droves, and they don’t come back.”
Rep. Gina Hinojosa (D–Austin) agreed and said the state should use its $32 billion surplus to fund teacher pay raises. She pointed out that Republican lawmakers had held teacher pay hostage in an attempt to pass a voucher last session, which ultimately failed.
“If we were to pay all Texas teachers a pay raise of $10,000, it would cost us about $3.8 billion a year,” Hinojosa said. “Take that for a biennium two years together, that’s around $8 billion. We absolutely have the money. It is money that we have collected for our schools from property taxpayers to pay teachers, which is the most important investment we can make in a child’s education.”
ATPE Governmental Relations Director Monty Exter also testified, asking committee members to remember that while the most important in-school factor tied to student success is a high-quality teacher and that the state must get that right, external factors—such as familial expectations for academic achievement and access to resources—have an even great statistical effect on student outcomes. Increased teacher attrition and, moreover, a failure to achieve optimal outcomes for students can be traced back to a lack of state resources provided to low-income families and the negative portrayal of certain student groups or schools, whether due to lack of funding, reliance on an abusive accountability system, or simply false, hurtful political rhetoric.
The committee also discussed early literacy and numeracy outcomes in grades Pre-K through 3. ATPE submitted written testimony, pointing out that access to Pre-K is generally shown to have positive impacts on early numeracy and literacy and asking the committee to work to expand access to Pre-K programs by providing funding to recruit and retain Pre-K teachers, expand public-private partnerships with child care centers, and lower class sizes. Early intervention, especially in identifying students with special education needs, is critical for these students to meet their academic goals. Additional funding could be used to hire intervention specialists and diagnosticians.
Interim hearings and the charges they address do not necessarily correlate to action that will be taken during the legislative session; however, they are a good window into a committee’s potential priorities in the next session. Recommendations made by those testifying during the hearings could make their way into potential legislation.
Read ATPE's testimony below:
CONVERSATION
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
![Blog Post Image](/getmedia/6852651e-b1e8-402b-91cd-bc34077dbdc1/240911_SBOE.png?width=3520&height=1164&ext=.png)
09/11/2024
Commissioner responds to questions about HB 1605 implementation
Morath insists new instructional materials are not intended to remove teachers’ lesson planning ability. The commissioner also answered questions on school accountability and grievance processes.
![Blog Post Image](/getmedia/9e1e09ed-90ff-4a1f-8d61-99015c4b76e9/TTV-ATPENews-WhiteHouse-1550x750.jpg?width=1550&height=750&ext=.jpg)
09/11/2024
How do Harris and Trump view education issues?
The major-party candidates for president are polar opposites when it comes to the federal role in funding public education and what K-12 curriculum should look like.
![Blog Post Image](/getmedia/b0adba57-e9b5-4d75-a2a9-8f5648612b70/texas-state-capitol-MK82RTL-1903x776.jpg?width=1903&height=776&ext=.jpg)
09/10/2024
Texas Senate releases second set of interim charges
Senate committees will examine K-12/college pathways and school enrollment trends, as well as implementation of new legislation.
It’s not always about the money! Don’t misunderstand me, everyone in the public school system deserves a raise - teachers, aides, office personnel, support staff, etc. But, one of the reasons I left teaching was the lack of discipline in our schools, and I was one of those teachers who was praised for her classroom management. Students can severely misbehave with little or no consequences. I worked as a certified elementary teacher for over 10 years and as a substitute for several years. Once while subbing, I had an elementary student misbehave repeatedly and finally sent him to the office. On his way out of the classroom, he told me I was the worst substitute ever. He was later escorted back to the classroom by the school resource officer with a lollipop! This is just one example. Bring order and discipline back to our schools and I believe you can retain certified educators as well as improve the quality of education in the great state of Texas.
I agree certified teachers make a difference in the classroom and if compensated and appreciated they would not be leaving the field because their purpose is to teach the children do they can succeed in life. Onthe other hand uncertified teachers are more likely to leave the profession because to them it is only a job and not a love of children being successful. They go where the money is and a less stress factor and leaving the reality of what a true teacher is trying to do for the children. When I started teaching you had a year to get certified or your job as a teacher was history. Whoever’s idea it was to hire and keep uncertified teachers was wrong. I hope they find a solution soon. Take care of your certified teachers by rewarding them.
I am a certified teacher working with a DOI uncertified teacher who is trying to get certified. I am held responsible for teaching him what to do and how to do it yet I am not compensated for teaching him or being a mentor. After teaching him what to do, I must complete my own course responsibilities. He''s kind and working hard so I make the sacrifice but the DOI is not beneficial to teachers. I would prefer to go back to the state law that we start school on the fourth Monday in August or after Labor Day. Starting school on August 1st with Meet the Teacher on that day required me to work for free multiple days before the start of the contract year to have my room ready for my sweet students. This is in part why veteran teachers are leaving the industry! It''s time the state pay educators what they are worth and require certified teachers.
It is sad where the education system is going. It is also sad how it becomes necessary for an educator to look for a second job because an educators salary cannot keep up with inflation. It’s about time to stop having wonderful professionals leave the field because they are underpaid and overworked.