More on Sen. Alexander's draft bill to reauthorize ESEA/NCLB
Date Posted: 1/20/2015
As we reported last week, U.S. Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN), chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP), released his version of a bill to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which is commonly referred to as No Child Left Behind (NCLB). The ESEA/NCLB is a law that determines the federal government’s role in public education. The contents of Alexander's draft bill, the Every Child Ready for College or Career Act of 2015, are summarized below. It is important to remember that this bill is in draft form. The Senate must still debate the bill in committee as well as the full Senate. If Alexander's bill is voted out of the Senate, it will still have to undergo the same process in the House of Representatives. Should this bill advance through the process, many changes can be expected and ATPE will provide updates as warranted via Teach the Vote. Related Teach the Vote content: For a quick recap on NCLB and what's at stake in the reauthorization process, check out Predictions on No Child Left Behind in the 114th Congress. Accountability In a departure from current law, Alexander's bill would allow states to develop their own accountability systems that would need to be approved by the U.S. Department of Education based on parameters outlined in the bill. However, the department would be strictly prohibited from requiring anything outside of those parameters, such as imposing certain standards, curriculum, or assessments. States' plans would also be subject to a peer review process developed by the secretary of education. Peer review teams would be appointed and would have to include teachers, principals, researchers, and others who have had experience through direct employment in a school, school board, or local or state government. The goal of the peer review is to “promote effective implementation,” “provide transparent feedback,” and support “state- and local-led innovation.” Testing The portion of Alexander's bill that deals with testing is designed to spur discussion. The intent is for the HELP committee to look at and debate two options:
- Option 1. States would be required to develop an assessment system that tests students in math, reading/language arts, and science, but states would have a lot of leeway in developing the system. States could implement annual testing, grade-span testing, summative testing, performance-based testing, a combination of annual and grade-span testing, or any other system of assessment developed by the state. States would not be required to seek approval from the secretary of education.
- Option 2. This option would maintain the current testing schedule as implemented under NCLB, which requires states to test reading and math in grades 3-8 and once in high school and also requires states to test science three times at some point during grades 3-12.
CONVERSATION
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
11/01/2024
Teach the Vote’s Week in Review: Nov. 1, 2024
As early voting wraps up, we look ahead to Election Day, share some voting dos and don’ts, and break down the importance of down-ballot races in public education.
10/31/2024
How to safely get out the vote among your colleagues
Just because you are an educator doesn’t negate your right to encourage your colleagues to vote pro-public education—you just have to be thoughtful about how you exercise that right.
10/29/2024
Early voting with a first-time voter
ATPE Lobbyist Heather Sheffield shared voting in the 2024 election with her 18-year-old daughter.