Texas Senate Education Committee continues debate over local oversight of charter schools
Texas Legislature Deregulation | Charter Schools Testing | Accountability
Date Posted: 5/04/2021 | Author: Mark Wiggins
The Senate Education Committee met Tuesday, May 4, to consider testimony on both House and Senate bills, including a bill that would significantly change the way charter schools are treated under local laws and ordinances.
Senate Bill (SB) 487 by Sen. Bryan Hughes (R-Mineola) heard by the committee today is yet another bill aimed at shielding charter schools from voter oversight and accountability. The bill would reduce the control of local communities by requiring local governments to treat charter schools as if they were independent school districts for the purposes of zoning, permitting, code compliance, and development. The result of the bill would be to exempt charter schools, which are governed by private entities, from important local ordinances.
SB 487 would prohibit a local community from enforcing any policy that prohibits a charter school from operating at any location within any zoning district. This would prevent a local community from enforcing zoning laws that are meant to protect public safety. Zoning laws are one of the main reasons there is usually significant physical separation between facilities that serve children and those that sell adult beverages or house adult-oriented businesses. ATPE joined most of the public education community in opposing SB 487 at today’s hearing.
Committee members also considered House Bill (HB) 1603 by Rep. Dan Huberty (R-Humble), an ATPE-supported bill that would remove the expiration date from the Individual Graduation Committee (IGC) law. Sen. Kel Seliger (R-Amarillo), who authored the original law and is sponsoring this bill in the Senate, explained that the IGC law has helped countless students who have faced difficulty completing the STAAR test for a variety of reasons that may be unrelated to their comprehension of the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Without IGCs in place, those students would have been barred from graduating.
The current IGC law is set to expire September 1, 2023. The statute has been extended for short periods since its original passage, and HB 1603 would finally remove the expiration date altogether, which ATPE strongly supports.
The Senate Education Committee also heard testimony Tuesday on the following bills:
- HB 699 by Rep. Jon Rosenthal (D-Houston), which would add consideration for students with severe or life-threatening illness or related treatment for the purposes of excused absences, truancy, grade promotion, etc.
- HB 725 by Rep. Jared Patterson (R-Frisco), which would expand pre-K eligibility to children who were in foster care in another state or territory before moving to Texas. ATPE supports this bill.
- HB 785 by Rep. Alma Allen (D-Houston), which would codify how admission, review, and dismissal committees incorporate student behavior intervention plans (BIP), increase notification requirements to parents regarding BIPs, and require school districts to take actions related to implementing a BIP after a discipline-related change in placement for the student.
- HB 1147 by Rep. Huberty, which would add enlistment in the Texas National Guard to the military readiness indicators for the college, career, or military readiness outcomes bonus under the Foundation School Program. ATPE supports this bill.
CONVERSATION
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
11/20/2024
SBOE approves controversial instructional materials
More than 100 members of the public expressed concern about the content and age appropriateness of Bluebonnet Learning materials.
11/15/2024
Teach the Vote’s Week in Review: Nov. 15, 2024
Voucher supporters propose going for “the whole enchilada” on vouchers, ATPE talks with NBC and CBS, and Social Security legislation goes up for consideration before the U.S. Senate.
11/12/2024
Republicans on video bragging about going for “the whole enchilada” on vouchers
As the rhetoric heats up and we inch closer to the start of the 89th legislative session, it is important to demand those asking for and supporting any voucher proposal to do so honestly and in good faith, providing transparency and agency to Texas taxpayers.